[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5438459.Mb6Ga2Xhyq@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:15:31 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Marc Dietrich <marvin24@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] ARM: tegra: use build-in device properties with rfkill_gpio
On Thursday 18 February 2016 21:04:49 Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 09:42 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 13:18 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >
> > > Johannes, I assume that you'll want to take this through your tree
> > > because of the dependency? In that case:
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> >
> > I can, but I don't really care - perhaps you'd rather take the entire
> > series through your tree to get it into one place for Marc?
> >
> > In which case, you have my
> >
> > Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> >
> > for the other 3 patches.
> >
> > Let me know which you prefer.
> >
> Did these patches get applied anywhere? Otherwise I'm willing to pick
> them up.
>
Fine with me too:
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Just for my curiosity: what is the difference between a rfkill-gpio
device and a gpio-keys device with a KEY_RFKILL code?
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6250.dts and others seem to
do the second approach in DT so they don't need to create the
platform device.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists