[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <HE1PR04MB0889C90C284F8C3B0F04DDA1F8A50@HE1PR04MB0889.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:24:04 +0000
From: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@...escale.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] gianfar: fix endianness for hardware timestamp
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcochran@...il.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 4:48 PM
> To: Yangbo Lu
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Claudiu Manoil
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gianfar: fix endianness for hardware timestamp
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 02:49:33PM +0800, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> > @@ -2708,6 +2708,7 @@ static void gfar_clean_tx_ring(struct
> gfar_priv_tx_q *tx_queue)
> > struct skb_shared_hwtstamps shhwtstamps;
> > u64 *ns = (u64 *)(((uintptr_t)skb->data + 0x10) &
> > ~0x7UL);
> > + *ns = be64_to_cpu(*ns);
> >
> > memset(&shhwtstamps, 0, sizeof(shhwtstamps));
> > shhwtstamps.hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(*ns);
>
> There is no point in modifying the buffer data in place.
>
> Instead, do this:
>
> memset(&shhwtstamps, 0, sizeof(shhwtstamps));
> shhwtstamps.hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(be64_to_cpu(*ns));
>
> or this:
>
> u64 ns, *ptr = (u64 *)(((uintptr_t)skb->data + 0x10) &
> ~0x7UL);
> ns = be64_to_cpu(*ptr);
>
> memset(&shhwtstamps, 0, sizeof(shhwtstamps));
> shhwtstamps.hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(ns);
>
[Lu Yangbo-B47093] I will modify codes according your suggestion.
Thank you so much!
> > @@ -3037,6 +3038,7 @@ static void gfar_process_frame(struct net_device
> *ndev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > if (priv->hwts_rx_en) {
> > struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *shhwtstamps = skb_hwtstamps(skb);
> > u64 *ns = (u64 *) skb->data;
> > + *ns = be64_to_cpu(*ns);
> >
> > memset(shhwtstamps, 0, sizeof(*shhwtstamps));
> > shhwtstamps->hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(*ns);
>
> Same here.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists