[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKvpyk2jT90-hQbgHbm5L-_7FG9bo3uCHkAuG2pQPWBKUJSujw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:14:58 +0530
From: Sathya Perla <sathya.perla@...adcom.com>
To: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] be2net: don't {en,dis}able filters on BE3 when
transparent tagging is enabled
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 26.2.2016 12:36, Sathya Perla wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The FILTMGMT privilege is necessary on BE3 chip to manipulare filters
>>> like MC, UC list management, VLAN filter, promisc mode... This privilege
>>> is dropped for VFs when transparrent tagging is enabled on them. This
>>> prevents to make interface up for such VF because be_enable_if_filters()
>>> called from be_open() fails thus be_open() also fails.
>>>
>>> Cc: Sathya Perla <sathya.perla@...adcom.com>
>>> Cc: Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
...
>>
>>
>> Ivan, in the be_enable_if_filters() routine the VF tries to enable the
>> basic filtering flags (not promisc mode etc) via the RX_FILTER cmd,
>> for which the VFs shouldn't need any FILTMGMT privileges. I also don't
>> expect be_cmd_pmac_add() to fail as the PF would have already
>> provisioned the mac-addr for the VF.
>> We should be able to reproduce this first thing Monday morning and see
>> what's wrong. Also, as the privilege rules are same across all chips,
>> any fix must be applicable for all chips that be2net supports.
>
> Hi Sathya,
> if the transparent VLAN tagging is enabled then be_enable_if_filters() will
> fail and be_open() will also fail. This happens only on BE3 not on Lancer as
> this does not support SR-IOV. I don't see any problem on Skyhawk.
>
> Log from the guest after 'ip link set ... up':
>
> [root@...tp-73-131-183 ~]# dmesg | tail -n 20
> pci 0000:00:07.0: no hotplug settings from platform
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: be2net version is 10.6.0.3r
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: enabling device (0040 -> 0042)
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: setting latency timer to 64
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: FW config: function_mode=0x14003, function_caps=0x4
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: VF is not privileged to issue opcode 125-1
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: Max: txqs 1, rxqs 1, rss 0, eqs 1, vfs 0
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: Max: uc-macs 2, mc-macs 64, vlans 64
> alloc irq_desc for 29 on node -1
> alloc kstat_irqs on node -1
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: irq 29 for MSI/MSI-X
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: enabled 1 MSI-x vector(s) for NIC
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: created 1 TX queue(s)
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: created 1 RX queue(s)
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: LPVID: 3
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: FW version is 10.4.255.25
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: HW Flow control - TX:1 RX:1
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: Emulex OneConnect(be3): VF port 0
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: VF is not privileged to issue opcode 34-1
> be2net 0000:00:07.0: VF is not privileged to issue opcode 60-1
>
> The be_open() calls be_enable_if_filters() -> be_cmd_rx_filter(). Command
> with opcode 34 alias NTWK_RX_FILTER fails thus be_open() also fails and
> be_close() is called as cleaning-up action. The be_close() calls then
> be_disable_if_filters() that calls be_cmd_pmac_del() (opcode 60). This also
> fails.
>
> As I has written above under Skyhawk this does not happen... so I has
> created BE3 specific patch.
>
Ivan, thanks for the dmesg log. I think the root-cause of this issue
is the MULTICAST bit in the BE_IF_EN_FLAGS. The FW is not allowing the
VF driver's be_cmd_rx_filter(BE_IF_EN_FLAGS) call. In
be_enable_if_filters() we are sensitive to this error, but in
be_set_rx_mode() we ignore any FW errors.
I'll provide an update Monday morning....thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists