netdev - [net-next PATCH v3 1/3] net: sched: consolidate offload decision in cls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:53:49 -0800
From:	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:	jiri@...nulli.us, john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
	simon.horman@...ronome.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com
Subject: [net-next PATCH v3 1/3] net: sched: consolidate offload decision in
 cls_u32

The offload decision was originally very basic and tied to if the dev
implemented the appropriate ndo op hook. The next step is to allow
the user to more flexibly define if any paticular rule should be
offloaded or not. In order to have this logic in one function lift
the current check into a helper routine tc_should_offload().

Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
---
 include/net/pkt_cls.h |    5 +++++
 net/sched/cls_u32.c   |    8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/pkt_cls.h b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
index 2121df5..e64d20b 100644
--- a/include/net/pkt_cls.h
+++ b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
@@ -392,4 +392,9 @@ struct tc_cls_u32_offload {
 	};
 };
 
+static inline bool tc_should_offload(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	return dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc;
+}
+
 #endif
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_u32.c b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
index d54bc94..24e888b 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_u32.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static void u32_remove_hw_knode(struct tcf_proto *tp, u32 handle)
 	offload.type = TC_SETUP_CLSU32;
 	offload.cls_u32 = &u32_offload;
 
-	if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc) {
+	if (tc_should_offload(dev)) {
 		offload.cls_u32->command = TC_CLSU32_DELETE_KNODE;
 		offload.cls_u32->knode.handle = handle;
 		dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc(dev, tp->q->handle,
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static void u32_replace_hw_hnode(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct tc_u_hnode *h)
 	offload.type = TC_SETUP_CLSU32;
 	offload.cls_u32 = &u32_offload;
 
-	if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc) {
+	if (tc_should_offload(dev)) {
 		offload.cls_u32->command = TC_CLSU32_NEW_HNODE;
 		offload.cls_u32->hnode.divisor = h->divisor;
 		offload.cls_u32->hnode.handle = h->handle;
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static void u32_clear_hw_hnode(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct tc_u_hnode *h)
 	offload.type = TC_SETUP_CLSU32;
 	offload.cls_u32 = &u32_offload;
 
-	if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc) {
+	if (tc_should_offload(dev)) {
 		offload.cls_u32->command = TC_CLSU32_DELETE_HNODE;
 		offload.cls_u32->hnode.divisor = h->divisor;
 		offload.cls_u32->hnode.handle = h->handle;
@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ static void u32_replace_hw_knode(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct tc_u_knode *n)
 	offload.type = TC_SETUP_CLSU32;
 	offload.cls_u32 = &u32_offload;
 
-	if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc) {
+	if (tc_should_offload(dev)) {
 		offload.cls_u32->command = TC_CLSU32_REPLACE_KNODE;
 		offload.cls_u32->knode.handle = n->handle;
 		offload.cls_u32->knode.fshift = n->fshift;