lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:28:46 -0800 From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com> Cc: Jiří Pírko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, simon.horman@...ronome.com, Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 1/3] net: sched: consolidate offload decision in cls_u32 On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:24 PM, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com> wrote: > On 16-02-26 09:39 AM, Cong Wang wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:53 AM, John Fastabend >> <john.fastabend@...il.com> wrote: >>> diff --git a/include/net/pkt_cls.h b/include/net/pkt_cls.h >>> index 2121df5..e64d20b 100644 >>> --- a/include/net/pkt_cls.h >>> +++ b/include/net/pkt_cls.h >>> @@ -392,4 +392,9 @@ struct tc_cls_u32_offload { >>> }; >>> }; >>> >>> +static inline bool tc_should_offload(struct net_device *dev) >>> +{ >>> + return dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc; >>> +} >>> + >> >> These should be protected by CONFIG_NET_CLS_U32, no? >> > > Its not necessary it is a completely general function and I only > lifted it out of cls_u32 so that the cls_flower classifier could > also use it. > > I don't see the need off-hand to have it wrapped in an ORd ifdef > statement where its (CONFIG_NET_CLS_U32 | CONFIG_NET_CLS_X ...). > Any particular reason you were thnking it should be wrapped in ifdefs? > Not a big deal. I just feel these don't need to compile when I have CONFIG_NET_CLS_U32=n. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists