netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 18/32] dsa: mv88e6xxx: Prepare for turning this into a library module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:53:11 +0100
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 18/32] dsa: mv88e6xxx: Prepare for turning this
 into a library module

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 09:40:56PM -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:
> 
> > Export all the functions so that we can later turn the module into a
> > library module.
> 
> As I mentioned in the first RFC [1], wouldn't that be preferable to
> avoid adding modules and factorize everything into a single one?
> 
> The common code would have a single probe function which calls
> mv88e6xxx_lookup_name for every model tables until it finds the good
> one.

Hi Vivien

This is all possible, but is not the point of what i'm trying to do
with this patchset. I want switch drivers to be linux devices, which
probe in the usual way. The changes i made here is the minimum needed
to allow that. What you are suggesting are further steps that could be
made. But since i already have 30 patches, i would prefer to get them
accepted and then think about this refactoring into one module. Such
refactoring should not change the device tree binding, so it can be
deferred.

	Andrew