lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHrpEqQkuH1JQfKFa=S+ZqbnHpR_SdihM3_dJ++nokV1tczM_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:47:19 -0600
From:	Zhi Li <lznuaa@...il.com>
To:	Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>
Cc:	Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@....com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"b38611@...escale.com" <b38611@...escale.com>,
	"fabio.estevam@...escale.com" <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
	"l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
	"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
	"tremyfr@...il.com" <tremyfr@...il.com>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"laci@...ndarydevices.com" <laci@...ndarydevices.com>,
	"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	"johannes@...solutions.net" <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	"stillcompiling@...il.com" <stillcompiling@...il.com>,
	"sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com" 
	<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 04/16] net: fec: reduce interrupts

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Troy Kisky
<troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com> wrote:
> On 3/2/2016 8:13 AM, Fugang Duan wrote:
>> From: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 8:37 AM
>>> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org; davem@...emloft.net; b38611@...escale.com
>>> Cc: fabio.estevam@...escale.com; l.stach@...gutronix.de; andrew@...n.ch;
>>> tremyfr@...il.com; linux@....linux.org.uk; linux-arm-
>>> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; laci@...ndarydevices.com; shawnguo@...nel.org;
>>> johannes@...solutions.net; stillcompiling@...il.com;
>>> sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com; arnd@...db.de; Troy Kisky
>>> <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>
>>> Subject: [PATCH net-next V2 04/16] net: fec: reduce interrupts
>>>
>>> By clearing the NAPI interrupts in the NAPI routine and not in the interrupt
>>> handler, we can reduce the number of interrupts. We also don't need any
>>> status variables as the registers are still valid.
>>>
>>> Also, notice that if budget pkts are received, the next call to fec_enet_rx_napi
>>> will now continue to receive the previously pending packets.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h      |   6 +-
>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 127 ++++++++++++----------------
>>> --
>>>  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
>>> index 195122e..001200b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.h
>>> @@ -505,11 +505,7 @@ struct fec_enet_private {
>>>
>>>      unsigned int total_tx_ring_size;
>>>      unsigned int total_rx_ring_size;
>>> -
>>> -    unsigned long work_tx;
>>> -    unsigned long work_rx;
>>> -    unsigned long work_ts;
>>> -    unsigned long work_mdio;
>>> +    uint    events;
>>>
>>>      struct  platform_device *pdev;
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
>>> index c517194..4a218b9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
>>> @@ -70,8 +70,6 @@ static void fec_enet_itr_coal_init(struct net_device
>>> *ndev);
>>>
>>>  #define DRIVER_NAME "fec"
>>>
>>> -#define FEC_ENET_GET_QUQUE(_x) ((_x == 0) ? 1 : ((_x == 1) ? 2 : 0))
>>> -
>>>  /* Pause frame feild and FIFO threshold */
>>>  #define FEC_ENET_FCE        (1 << 5)
>>>  #define FEC_ENET_RSEM_V     0x84
>>> @@ -1257,21 +1255,6 @@ static void fec_txq(struct net_device *ndev, struct
>>> fec_enet_private *fep,
>>>              writel(0, txq->bd.reg_desc_active);
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -static void
>>> -fec_enet_tx(struct net_device *ndev)
>>> -{
>>> -    struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev);
>>> -    struct fec_enet_priv_tx_q *txq;
>>> -    u16 queue_id;
>>> -    /* First process class A queue, then Class B and Best Effort queue */
>>> -    for_each_set_bit(queue_id, &fep->work_tx, FEC_ENET_MAX_TX_QS)
>>> {
>>> -            clear_bit(queue_id, &fep->work_tx);
>>> -            txq = fep->tx_queue[FEC_ENET_GET_QUQUE(queue_id)];
>>> -            fec_txq(ndev, fep, txq);
>>> -    }
>>> -    return;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>  static int
>>>  fec_enet_new_rxbdp(struct net_device *ndev, struct bufdesc *bdp, struct
>>> sk_buff *skb)  { @@ -1504,92 +1487,80 @@ rx_processing_done:
>>>      return pkt_received;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -static int
>>> -fec_enet_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int budget) -{
>>> -    int     pkt_received = 0;
>>> -    u16     queue_id;
>>> -    struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev);
>>> -    struct fec_enet_priv_rx_q *rxq;
>>> -
>>> -    for_each_set_bit(queue_id, &fep->work_rx, FEC_ENET_MAX_RX_QS)
>>> {
>>> -            clear_bit(queue_id, &fep->work_rx);
>>> -            rxq = fep->rx_queue[FEC_ENET_GET_QUQUE(queue_id)];
>>> -            pkt_received += fec_rxq(ndev, fep, rxq, budget -
>>> pkt_received);
>>> -    }
>>> -    return pkt_received;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static bool
>>> -fec_enet_collect_events(struct fec_enet_private *fep, uint int_events) -{
>>> -    if (int_events == 0)
>>> -            return false;
>>> -
>>> -    if (int_events & FEC_ENET_RXF_0)
>>> -            fep->work_rx |= (1 << 2);
>>> -    if (int_events & FEC_ENET_RXF_1)
>>> -            fep->work_rx |= (1 << 0);
>>> -    if (int_events & FEC_ENET_RXF_2)
>>> -            fep->work_rx |= (1 << 1);
>>> -
>>> -    if (int_events & FEC_ENET_TXF_0)
>>> -            fep->work_tx |= (1 << 2);
>>> -    if (int_events & FEC_ENET_TXF_1)
>>> -            fep->work_tx |= (1 << 0);
>>> -    if (int_events & FEC_ENET_TXF_2)
>>> -            fep->work_tx |= (1 << 1);
>>> -
>>> -    return true;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>  static irqreturn_t
>>>  fec_enet_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)  {
>>>      struct net_device *ndev = dev_id;
>>>      struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev);
>>> -    uint int_events;
>>> -    irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
>>> +    uint eir = readl(fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT);
>>> +    uint int_events = eir & readl(fep->hwp + FEC_IMASK);
>>>
>>> -    int_events = readl(fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT);
>>> -    writel(int_events, fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT);
>>> -    fec_enet_collect_events(fep, int_events);
>>> -
>>> -    if ((fep->work_tx || fep->work_rx) && fep->link) {
>>> -            ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> +    if (!int_events)
>>> +            return IRQ_NONE;
>>>
>>> +    if (int_events & (FEC_ENET_RXF | FEC_ENET_TXF)) {
>>>              if (napi_schedule_prep(&fep->napi)) {
>>>                      /* Disable the NAPI interrupts */
>>>                      writel(FEC_NAPI_IMASK, fep->hwp + FEC_IMASK);
>>>                      __napi_schedule(&fep->napi);
>>> +                    int_events &= ~(FEC_ENET_RXF | FEC_ENET_TXF);
>>> +                    if (!int_events)
>>> +                            return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> +            } else {
>>> +                    fep->events |= int_events;
>>> +                    pr_info("%s: couldn't schedule NAPI\n", __func__);
>>>              }
>>>      }
>>>
>>> -    if (int_events & FEC_ENET_MII) {
>>> -            ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> +    writel(int_events, fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT);
>>> +    if (int_events & FEC_ENET_MII)
>>>              complete(&fep->mdio_done);
>>> -    }
>>>
>>> -    if (fep->ptp_clock)
>>> +    if ((int_events & FEC_ENET_TS_TIMER) && fep->ptp_clock)
>>>              fec_ptp_check_pps_event(fep);
>>> -
>> This is error in here.  FEC compare timer event is not TS timer.
>>
>>
>
>
> So when should fec_ptp_check_pps_event be called ? On every interrupt ?

Compare event is not showed in EIR register.  Need check TCSR, please
see below code.

uint fec_ptp_check_pps_event(struct fec_enet_private *fep)
{
xx
 val = readl(fep->hwp + FEC_TCSR(channel));
        if (val & FEC_T_TF_MASK) {
}
>
> If napi is active, it is going to be delayed for a very long time.
> Should it be moved to the napi routine?
>
>
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ