[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56D72E2F.30207@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:17:19 -0800
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: properly apply change to
ignore_routes_on_linkdown to all interfaces
On 3/2/16 8:43 AM, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>
> +/* called with RTNL locked */
> +static void inet_ignore_routes_change(struct net *net)
> +{
> + struct net_device *dev;
> + int on = IPV4_DEVCONF_ALL(net, IGNORE_ROUTES_WITH_LINKDOWN);
> +
> + IPV4_DEVCONF_DFLT(net, IGNORE_ROUTES_WITH_LINKDOWN) = on;
> + inet_netconf_notify_devconf(net, NETCONFA_IGNORE_ROUTES_WITH_LINKDOWN,
> + NETCONFA_IFINDEX_ALL,
> + net->ipv4.devconf_all);
> + inet_netconf_notify_devconf(net, NETCONFA_IGNORE_ROUTES_WITH_LINKDOWN,
> + NETCONFA_IFINDEX_DEFAULT,
> + net->ipv4.devconf_dflt);
> +
> + for_each_netdev(net, dev) {
> + struct in_device *in_dev;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(dev);
> + if (in_dev) {
> + IN_DEV_CONF_SET(in_dev,
> + IGNORE_ROUTES_WITH_LINKDOWN, on);
> + inet_netconf_notify_devconf(net,
> + NETCONFA_IGNORE_ROUTES_WITH_LINKDOWN,
> + dev->ifindex, &in_dev->cnf);
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + }
> +}
> +
This seems wrong -- changing the 'all' and 'default' settings for a
sysctl should not require walking the interface list.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists