[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWGtRfbbGKD6i+XY0epgNkn=mNGnWG31dLhq7XLykdvFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:26:27 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Kyeong Yoo <Kyeong.Yoo@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked()
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Kyeong Yoo
<Kyeong.Yoo@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
> This fix is for dsmark similar to 3557619f0f6f7496ed453d4825e24958ab1884e0,
> and makes use of qdisc_dequeue_peeked() instead of direct dequeue() call.
>
> First time, wrr peeks dsmark, which will then peek into sfq.
> sfq dequeues an skb and it's stored in sch->gso_skb.
> Next time, wrr tries to dequeue from dsmark, which will call sfq dequeue
> directly. This results skipping the previously peeked skb.
>
> So changed dsmark dequeue to call qdisc_dequeue_peeked() instead to use
> peeked skb if exists.
This part looks reasonable to me.
>
> Also replaced dsmark peek to use qdisc_peek_dequeued() which works correctly
> if previously peeked skb still exists.
But not this part, since sfq already calls qdisc_peek_dequeued()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists