netdev - Re: [PATCH] iproute2: Fix musl compatibility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160302110340.0d73e5ee@xeon-e3>
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:03:40 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:	Loganaden Velvindron <logan@...kers.mu>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iproute2: Fix musl compatibility

On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 03:34:48 -0800
Loganaden Velvindron <logan@...kers.mu> wrote:

> diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter.h b/include/linux/netfilter.h
> index b71b4c9..3e4e6ae 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netfilter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netfilter.h
> @@ -4,8 +4,6 @@
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/sysctl.h>
> -#include <linux/in.h>
> -#include <linux/in6.h>
>  
>  /* Responses from hook functio

Sorry, I have to reject this.
All include files in include/linux come from headers automatically generated from upstream
Linux source. This is the only way to ensure long term ABI/API consistency
with kernel.

Either fix musl or submit patches to upstream kernel and get them merged.