netdev - Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers 2016-02-18

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 4 Mar 2016 11:14:09 -0600
From:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers 2016-02-18

On 03/04/2016 09:29 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> (Adding Larry)
>
> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>>> rtlwifi
>>>
>>> * fix broken VHT (802.11ac) support, reported by Linus
>>
>> That's commit d76d65fd26951498144029c24852c4d54ee512d9
>>
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rc.c: In function
>> ‘_rtl_rc_rate_set_series’:
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rc.c:144: warning: comparison is
>> always false due to limited range of data type
>>
>>                  if (sta && sta->vht_cap.vht_supported &&
>>                      (wireless_mode == WIRELESS_MODE_AC_5G ||
>>                       wireless_mode == WIRELESS_MODE_AC_24G ||
>>                       wireless_mode == WIRELESS_MODE_AC_ONLY))
>>                          rate->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_RC_VHT_MCS;
>>
>> u8 wireless_mode = 0;
>>
>> enum wireless_mode {
>>          ...
>>          WIRELESS_MODE_AC_ONLY = 0x100,
>>
>> How is that supposed to work?
>
> I have no idea what could be the difference, for example, between AC_5G
> and AC_ONLY. Maybe AC_ONLY mode is not really used in normal setups and
> that's why the bug doesn't break anything? Larry, do you know?
>
> Anyway, Larry has a patch for this but I'm planning to send it to 4.6 as
> I didn't think it as that urgent:
>
> rtlwifi: Fix size of wireless mode variable
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8425191/

That WIRELESS_MODE_AC_ONLY mode is part of a recent commit to a repo that 
Realtek and I use as a place for their most recent changes. As I do not have, 
nor want, an NDA with them, I could only speculate about their reasons for such 
a mode. I included it because I was touching that portion of the code. 
Unfortunately, I did not catch the associated change in the variable size.

Saving the second patch for 4.6 is the correct action.

Larry