netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] drm/vmwgfx: remove userland definition of DIV_ROUND

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACvgo53Hc9OztHKSn=PNjd019M9ba_Qz1SvmJ4OBQG-p5q1o7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 Mar 2016 21:36:25 +0000
From:	Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
To:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
	Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Karen Xie <kxie@...lsio.com>, ben@...adent.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] drm/vmwgfx: remove userland definition of DIV_ROUND_UP

Hi Nicolas,

On 4 March 2016 at 10:52, Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> wrote:
> Let's use __KERNEL_DIV_ROUND_UP, which is defined in uapi/linux/kernel.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
> ---
>  .../drm/vmwgfx/device_include/svga3d_surfacedefs.h   | 20 +++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/device_include/svga3d_surfacedefs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/device_include/svga3d_surfacedefs.h
> index 58704f0a4607..531d22025fec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/device_include/svga3d_surfacedefs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/device_include/svga3d_surfacedefs.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
>   *
>   **************************************************************************/
>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +
Files from DRM modules tend to be used in various (crazy) ways. Be
that in linux and/or other user space.

Fairly certain that everything is fine here, just adding one of the
core vmwgfx developers.

Thomas, this won't cause any issues would it ?

Can you guys please add an entry for vmwgfx to MAINTAINERS, so that
people can CC you guys on patches that touch the driver ?

Thanks
Emil