[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160305155714.GM4184@uranus.lan>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 18:57:14 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, solar@...nwall.com,
vvs@...tuozzo.com, avagin@...tuozzo.com, xemul@...tuozzo.com,
vdavydov@...tuozzo.com, khorenko@...tuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: ipv4 -- Introduce ifa limit per net
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 11:11:09PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 16:08:30 -0800
>
> > __inet_del_ifa() should probably take into account in_dev->dead (no
> > promotion, no list scan...)
>
> Indeed, that is the real problem:
Well, tried it out. Indeed it partially released the contention
but with patch applied I stuck with
Samples: 20K of event 'cpu-clock', Event count (approx.): 4647374938
Overhead Shared Object Symbol
19.27% [kernel] [k] __local_bh_enable_ip
15.97% [kernel] [k] lock_acquire
15.12% [kernel] [k] fib_del_ifaddr
11.66% [kernel] [k] lock_release
7.57% [kernel] [k] lock_is_held
5.35% [kernel] [k] lock_acquired
3.26% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
3.04% [kernel] [k] __local_bh_disable_ip
2.10% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irq
1.54% [kernel] [k] native_save_fl
1.37% [kernel] [k] ___might_sleep
0.90% [kernel] [k] do_raw_spin_trylock
0.83% [kernel] [k] nf_ct_iterate_cleanup
0.77% [kernel] [k] debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled
0.62% [kernel] [k] tick_nohz_idle_enter
0.61% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_lock
0.58% [kernel] [k] __slab_alloc.isra.43.constprop.47
0.42% [kernel] [k] get_parent_ip
0.40% [kernel] [k] preempt_count_sub
0.36% [kernel] [k] native_save_fl
0.34% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_unlock
0.31% [kernel] [k] do_raw_spin_unlock
and until everything get cleaned up I couldn't connect
to the node via ssh. I continue playing with patch maybe
I find some other optimization paths. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists