[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <HE1PR0401MB18493D58257B539E298B3910FFBF0@HE1PR0401MB1849.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 23:55:05 +0000
From: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@....com>
To: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"b38611@...escale.com" <b38611@...escale.com>
CC: "fabio.estevam@...escale.com" <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
"l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"tremyfr@...il.com" <tremyfr@...il.com>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"laci@...ndarydevices.com" <laci@...ndarydevices.com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"johannes@...solutions.net" <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"stillcompiling@...il.com" <stillcompiling@...il.com>,
"sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com"
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next V2 07/16] net: fec: set cbd_sc without relying on
previous value
From: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2016 12:08 AM
> To: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@....com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> davem@...emloft.net; b38611@...escale.com
> Cc: fabio.estevam@...escale.com; l.stach@...gutronix.de; andrew@...n.ch;
> tremyfr@...il.com; linux@....linux.org.uk; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; laci@...ndarydevices.com; shawnguo@...nel.org;
> johannes@...solutions.net; stillcompiling@...il.com;
> sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com; arnd@...db.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 07/16] net: fec: set cbd_sc without relying on
> previous value
>
> On 3/4/2016 2:29 AM, Fugang Duan wrote:
> > From: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com> Sent: Thursday,
> > February 25, 2016 8:37 AM
> >> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org; davem@...emloft.net;
> b38611@...escale.com
> >> Cc: fabio.estevam@...escale.com; l.stach@...gutronix.de;
> >> andrew@...n.ch; tremyfr@...il.com; linux@....linux.org.uk; linux-arm-
> >> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; laci@...ndarydevices.com;
> >> shawnguo@...nel.org; johannes@...solutions.net;
> >> stillcompiling@...il.com; sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com;
> >> arnd@...db.de; Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH net-next V2 07/16] net: fec: set cbd_sc without
> >> relying on previous value
> >>
> >> Relying on the wrap bit to stay valid once initialized when the
> >> controller also writes to this byte seems undesirable since we can
> >> easily know what the value should be.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 38
> >> +++++++++----------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> >> index 791f385..6ceb5f9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> >> @@ -340,9 +340,8 @@ fec_enet_txq_submit_frag_skb(struct
> >> fec_enet_priv_tx_q *txq,
> >> bdp = fec_enet_get_nextdesc(bdp, &txq->bd);
> >> ebdp = (struct bufdesc_ex *)bdp;
> >>
> >> - status = fec16_to_cpu(bdp->cbd_sc);
> >> - status &= ~BD_ENET_TX_STATS;
> >> - status |= (BD_ENET_TX_TC | BD_ENET_TX_READY);
> >> + status = BD_ENET_TX_TC | BD_ENET_TX_READY |
> >> + ((bdp == txq->bd.last) ? BD_SC_WRAP : 0);
> >> frag_len = skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[frag].size;
> >>
> >> /* Handle the last BD specially */ @@ -436,8 +435,6 @@ static
> int
> >> fec_enet_txq_submit_skb(struct fec_enet_priv_tx_q *txq,
> >> /* Fill in a Tx ring entry */
> >> bdp = txq->bd.cur;
> >> last_bdp = bdp;
> >> - status = fec16_to_cpu(bdp->cbd_sc);
> >> - status &= ~BD_ENET_TX_STATS;
> >>
> >> /* Set buffer length and buffer pointer */
> >> bufaddr = skb->data;
> >> @@ -462,6 +459,8 @@ static int fec_enet_txq_submit_skb(struct
> >> fec_enet_priv_tx_q *txq,
> >> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + status = BD_ENET_TX_TC | BD_ENET_TX_READY |
> >> + ((bdp == txq->bd.last) ? BD_SC_WRAP : 0);
> >> if (nr_frags) {
> >> last_bdp = fec_enet_txq_submit_frag_skb(txq, skb, ndev);
> >> if (IS_ERR(last_bdp)) {
> >> @@ -512,7 +511,6 @@ static int fec_enet_txq_submit_skb(struct
> >> fec_enet_priv_tx_q *txq,
> >> /* Send it on its way. Tell FEC it's ready, interrupt when done,
> >> * it's the last BD of the frame, and to put the CRC on the end.
> >> */
> >> - status |= (BD_ENET_TX_READY | BD_ENET_TX_TC);
> >
> > This is completely error. We have to prepare all BDs for frag skb, and then
> enable "READY" and "TC" bit for the first BD, otherwise uDMA copy un-correct
> data to fifo.
> >
>
>
>
>
> I don't follow. Please read patch again.
>
Understand, sorry, I take one mistake. The patch is fine for me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists