[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1457281392.2663.5.camel@edumazet-ThinkPad-T530>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 08:23:12 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
solar@...nwall.com, vvs@...tuozzo.com, avagin@...tuozzo.com,
xemul@...tuozzo.com, vdavydov@...tuozzo.com, khorenko@...tuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: ipv4 -- Introduce ifa limit per net
On dim., 2016-03-06 at 13:09 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Anyway, then I run this script for 255 as parameter
> in one pass which gen. requests to create 65025 addresses
> and kernel start complaining:
>
> Perf output
> -----------
> 24.95% [kernel] [k] __local_bh_enable_ip
> 21.52% [kernel] [k] lock_acquire
> 15.54% [kernel] [k] lock_release
> 9.84% [kernel] [k] lock_is_held
> 7.47% [kernel] [k] lock_acquired
> 4.08% [kernel] [k] __local_bh_disable_ip
Well, this looks like LOCKDEP kernel. Are you really running LOCKDEP on
production kernels ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists