netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADhT+wfO8x4En78g5ixnnwbpaeXJGDo+Q1sOABYsbXzNZy0CPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:22:24 -0600
From:	Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@...il.com>
To:	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc:	Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
	Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...aro.org>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
	Fabrice GASNIER <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de> wrote:
> Am 07.03.2016 um 16:52 schrieb Giuseppe CAVALLARO:
>> On 3/7/2016 4:46 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 07.03.2016 um 16:09 schrieb Giuseppe CAVALLARO:
>>>> On 3/7/2016 3:27 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>>>> Indeed, reverting Gabriel's commit fixes the observed error messages
>>> [...]
>>>>> However, I am unable to ping any hosts on the network now.
>>>>
>>>> hmm, this could be another problem. I wonder if you can
>>>> check which recent patch is introducing the problem on ARM64.
>>>> For example if this depends on Oct_2015 update.
>>>
>>> I've had success reverting drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/ up to and
>>> including "stmmac: first frame prep at the end of xmit routine", i.e.
>>> top 7 commits.
>>
>> Andreas, I will check it and let you know asap.
>
> I verified that it's just these two commits that I need to revert:
>
> "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression"
> "stmmac: first frame prep at the end of xmit routine"
>
> Those in between don't cause conflicts and seem to work okay.
>

I'm seeing the same issue on the SoCFPGA platform:

libphy: PHY stmmac-0:ffffffff not found
eth0: Could not attach to PHY
stmmac_open: Cannot attach to PHY (error: -19)

If I just revert:

 "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression"

then the issue goes away.

Thanks,
Dinh