[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADhT+weKf+F98uxCQhRa2RfMm8+4p=rrNZc-Vf=w_HPycXto=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:45:04 -0600
From: Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@...il.com>
To: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...aro.org>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Fabrice GASNIER <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
<peppe.cavallaro@...com> wrote:
> Hi Dinh,
>
> On 3/8/2016 12:22 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>>
>> I'm seeing the same issue on the SoCFPGA platform:
>>
>> libphy: PHY stmmac-0:ffffffff not found
>> eth0: Could not attach to PHY
>> stmmac_open: Cannot attach to PHY (error: -19)
>>
>> If I just revert:
>>
>> "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression"
>>
>> then the issue goes away.
>
>
> do you have this patch "stmmac: first frame prep at the end of xmit routine"
> ? Or you just reverted
> "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression"
I only reverted "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression". I do have the
patch "stmmac: first frame prep at the end of the xmit routine", but I did not
need to revert that patch.
Dinh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists