netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 2/7] mlx4: use napi_consume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:36:07 +0100
From:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	alexander.duyck@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	eugenia@...lanox.com, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
	saeedm@...lanox.com, gerlitz.or@...il.com, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/7] mlx4: use napi_consume_skb API to get bulk
 free operations

On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:03:20 -0500 (EST)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 08:47:58 -0800
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:00 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> > <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:  
> >> Passing the budget down was Alex'es design.  Axel any thoughts?  
> > 
> > I'd say just use dev_consume_skb_any in the bulk free instead of
> > dev_consume_skb_irq.  This is slow path, as you said, so it shouldn't
> > come up often.  
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> >> I do wonder how expensive this check is... as it goes into a code
> >> hotpath, which is very unlikely.  The good thing would be, that we
> >> handle if buggy drivers call this function from a none softirq context
> >> (as these bugs could be hard to catch).
> >>
> >> Can netpoll ever be called from softirq or with BH disabled? (It
> >> disables IRQs, which would break calling kmem_cache_free_bulk).  
> > 
> > It is better for us to switch things out so that the napi_consume_skb
> > is the fast path with dev_consume_skb_any as the slow.  There are too
> > many scenarios where we could be invoking something that makes use of
> > this within the Tx path so it is probably easiest to just solve it
> > that way so we don't have to deal with it again in the future.  
> 
> Indeed.

So, if I understand you correctly, then we drop the budget parameter
and check for in_softirq(), like:

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 7af7ec635d90..a3c61a9b65d2 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -796,14 +796,14 @@ void __kfree_skb_defer(struct sk_buff *skb)
        _kfree_skb_defer(skb);
 }
 
-void napi_consume_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int budget)
+void napi_consume_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
        if (unlikely(!skb))
                return;
 
-       /* if budget is 0 assume netpoll w/ IRQs disabled */
-       if (unlikely(!budget)) {
-               dev_consume_skb_irq(skb);
+       /* Handle if not called from NAPI context, and netpoll invocation */
+       if (unlikely(!in_softirq())) {
+               dev_consume_skb_any(skb);
                return;
        }


-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer