[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C2353FFE-5D2F-4B8B-9241-B50113F63723@ovn.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 15:14:43 -0800
From: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@....org>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dev@...nvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next v8 3/8] openvswitch: Add commentary to conntrack.c
Sergei,
Just found this from my junk mail box, sorry. Will fix spelling, but I just sent v9 and will wait for other reviews before re-posting.
Jarno
> On Mar 9, 2016, at 5:50 AM, Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> On 3/9/2016 3:24 AM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
>> This makes the code easier to understand and the following patches
>> more focused.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@....org>
>> ---
>> net/openvswitch/conntrack.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
>> index 3045290..8cd0110 100644
>> --- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
>> +++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
> [...]
>> @@ -418,6 +429,13 @@ static int ovs_ct_lookup(struct net *net, struct sw_flow_key *key,
>> {
>> struct nf_conntrack_expect *exp;
>>
>> + /* If we pass an expected packet through nf_conntrack_in() the
>> + * expectiation is typically removed, but the packet could still be
>
> Expectation.
> [...]
>
> MBR, Sergei
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists