netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/4] infiniband: hns: add Hisilicon RoCE support(driver code)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56E0066E.1000106@huawei.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Mar 2016 19:18:06 +0800
From:	oulijun <oulijun@...wei.com>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	"Wei Hu(Xavier)" <xavier.huwei@...wei.com>
CC:	<dledford@...hat.com>, <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
	<hal.rosenstock@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, <jiri@...lanox.com>,
	<ogerlitz@...lanox.com>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<gongyangming@...wei.com>, <xiaokun@...wei.com>,
	<tangchaofei@...wei.com>, <haifeng.wei@...wei.com>,
	<yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>, <yankejian@...wei.com>,
	<lisheng011@...wei.com>, <charles.chenxin@...wei.com>,
	<linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] infiniband: hns: add Hisilicon RoCE support(driver
 code)

Hi Jiri Pirko, thanks for reviewing
On 2016/3/4 17:16, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:41:16AM CET, xavier.huwei@...wei.com wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> +int hns_roce_buf_alloc(
>> +			struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
>> +			int size, int max_direct,
>> +			struct hns_roce_buf *buf)
> 
> <snip>	
> 	
>> +
>> +			pages =
>> +				kmalloc(sizeof(*pages) * buf->nbufs,
>> +					GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> +
>> +			buf->direct.buf = vmap(
>> +						pages, buf->nbufs, VM_MAP,
>> +						PAGE_KERNEL);
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> +	if (
>> +		event_type != HNS_ROCE_EVENT_TYPE_CQ_ID_INVALID &&
>> +		event_type != HNS_ROCE_EVENT_TYPE_CQ_ACCESS_ERROR &&
>> +		event_type != HNS_ROCE_EVENT_TYPE_CQ_OVERFLOW) {
>> +		dev_err(&hr_dev->pdev->dev,
>> +			"hns_roce_ib: Unexpected event type 0x%x on CQ %06x\n",
>> +			event_type, hr_cq->cqn);
>> +		return;
>> +	}
> 
> Although checkpatch does not complain, I find this semi-random adding of
> newlines quite odd.
> 
    Really, the question you mentioned exit in many location in currently patch. I done it
in order to make it complain checkpatch and linux norms. Now, I have checked and adjust it
properly combined to checkpatch
    I will send a new patch in future. if not modified in some locations, it have to violate
checkpatch once modified and is unable to adjust it better. About these,  have you best strategy?

Thanks
Lijun Ou
> .
>