lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+sq2CeMQMnmGPUWoLrtPzGiJpvNTsR_WmQzQr5wFVC9b3LU-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2016 23:57:48 +0530
From:	Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...ium.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: thunderx: Set recevie buffer page usage count in bulk

>
> So calculate the modulus on the page split count and optimize the
> increment ahead of time when possible, and for the sub page split
> pieces do it one at a time.
>
Patch does almost the same with a negligible overhead of a counter
for page->_count increment at a later time but still before HW starts
using buffers.
Difference between NIU driver and this patch is there it's
calculate split count, increment page count and then divide page into
buffers. Here it's divide page into buffers, have a counter which increments
at every split and then at the end do a atomic increment of page->_count.

Any issue with this approach ?

Thanks,
Sunil.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ