netdev - Re: [PATCH nf-next v8 1/8] netfilter: Remove IP_CT_NEW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <B234C951-5BA2-4A1F-B418-FCDDDEEBE544@ovn.org>
Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:44:51 -0800
From:	Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@....org>
To:	Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
Cc:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next v8 1/8] netfilter: Remove IP_CT_NEW_REPLY definition.

Thanks for pointing this out, v10, which hope is the final version, will have the cover letter back.

  Jarno

> On Mar 10, 2016, at 1:16 AM, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@....org> wrote:
>> Remove the definition of IP_CT_NEW_REPLY from the kernel as it does
>> not make sense.  This allows the definition of IP_CT_NUMBER to be
>> simplified as well.
> 
> I just realized that after V7 you stopped sending cover letter (patch 0/N)
> with this series.
> 
> Maybe you send it and this misses the list? we need to be able to see
> differences from earlier versions.
> 
> Or.