[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN3PR11MB02730845402BE347A2F978848BB50@BN3PR11MB0273.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 06:40:01 +0000
From: Rajesh Borundia <rajesh.borundia@...gic.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Dept-GE Linux NIC Dev <Dept-GELinuxNICDev@...gic.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v2 0/2] qlcnic fixes
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
>Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 2:47 AM
>To: Rajesh Borundia <rajesh.borundia@...gic.com>
>Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; Dept-GE Linux NIC Dev <Dept-
>GELinuxNICDev@...gic.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] qlcnic fixes
>
>From: Rajesh Borundia <rajesh.borundia@...gic.com>
>Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 02:39:56 -0500
>
>> This series adds following fixes.
>>
>> o While processing mailbox if driver gets a spurious mailbox
>> interrupt it leads into premature completion of a next
>> mailbox request. Added a guard against this by checking current
>> state of mailbox and ignored spurious interrupt.
>> Added a stats counter to record this condition.
>>
>> v2:
>>
>> o Added patch that removes usage of atomic_t as we are not implemeting
>> atomicity by using atomic_t value.
>>
>> Please apply these fixes to net.
>
>As explained in other list postings, 'net' is basically closed for this release cycle,
>so I applied this series to 'net-next'.
>
Thanks.
>Let me know if you'd like me to therefore queue these changes up for -stable.
>
Please queue the changes for stable.
>Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists