netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ethtool: support setting default Rx flow indirection table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1457886300.3331.26.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:25:00 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ethtool: support setting default Rx flow
 indirection table

On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 21:22 +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> ---
> 
> Not sure if there is a mailing list for this, I sent this to the netdev
> list but forgot to Cc you on the ethtool change.

I haven't been keeping up with netdev for a long time, but I have
recently set up filtering by subject so I can keep up with just the
ethtool-related messages.  Still, patches for the ethtool command
should always be explicitly sent to me.

> Dave applied the
> network core patches, but they're more or less useless unless we
> actually have the ability to request default setting using ethtool
> (which I extended to support "default" here)

The patch was mangled (word-wrapped and modified white-space) in this
message, so I took the version in
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/398404/>.

[...]
> @@ -3332,7 +3335,7 @@ static int do_srxfh(struct cmd_context *ctx)
>  	u32 entry_size = sizeof(rss_head.rss_config[0]);
>  	u32 num_weights = 0;
>  
> -	if (ctx->argc < 2)
> +	if (ctx->argc < 1)
>  		exit_bad_args();
[...]

This means we might continue without having the required parameter
after "equal", "weight" or "hkey".  But, having said that, since we're
only checking once before running the loop, we're already failing to
validate that properly.

I've applied this, but could you please send another patch that adds
checks on ctx->argc within the loop and test cases in test-cmdline.c?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
If at first you don't succeed, you're doing about average.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)