lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <56E6E4B0.8060408@st.com> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:20:00 +0100 From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com> To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@...euvizoso.net> CC: Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@...il.com>, Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>, Fabrice GASNIER <fabrice.gasnier@...com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...aro.org>, Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>, Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@...glemail.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement Hi Tomeu On 3/14/2016 12:43 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi Peppe, > > with that patch I don't see any difference at all in my setup. > > So to be clear, with these commits on top of next-20160314, I still > get the hang during boot: > > 209afef6f0cd ARM: dts: rockchip: Add mdio node to ethernet node > 2315acc6cf7f Revert "stmmac: first frame prep at the end of xmit routine" > b5e08e810c63 stmmac: fix tx prepare for normal desc > 37c15a31d850 i2c: immediately mark ourselves as registered > 4342eec3c5a2 Add linux-next specific files for 20160314 > > [ 27.521026] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:303 > dev_watchdog+0x284/0x288 > [ 27.529460] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (rk_gmac-dwmac): transmit queue 0 timed out I do not reproduce the WATCHDOG but i am continuing to look at the code to understand if normal descriptor management is ok or not. I keep you informed. Just an info, did you test with 2315acc6cf7f included? Just to understand if it is introducing a problem. It works in case of enhanced descriptors are used instead of. > > https://git.collabora.com/cgit/user/tomeu/linux.git/log/?h=broken-eth-on-rock2 thx I will take a look at this Regards Peppe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists