netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 0/4] Few mvneta fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:49:45 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, jason@...edaemon.net,
	andrew@...n.ch, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alior@...vell.com,
	nadavh@...vell.com, mw@...ihalf.com, patrick@...terwijk.org,
	dima@...vell.com, oferh@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/4] Few mvneta fixes

From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 18:44:16 +0100

> In this second version I split the last patch in two parts as
> requested.
> 
> For the record the initial cover letter was:
> "here is a patch set of few fixes. Without the first one, a kernel
> configured with debug features ended to hang when the driver is built
> as a module and is removed. This is quite is annoying for debugging!
> 
> The second patch fix a forgotten flag at the initial submission of the
> driver.
> 
> The third patch is only really a cosmetic one so I have no problem to
> not apply it for 4.5 and wait for 4.6.
> 
> I really would like to see the first one applied for 4.5 and for the
> second I let you judge if it something needed for now or that should
> wait the next release."

Series applied and patches #1 and #2 queued up for -stable, thanks.