lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG88wWbKagbn7yUVVi2GW8t1amMWZOsCdNqmB_-mZuozXQfkVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:19:11 -0700
From:	David Decotigny <ddecotig@...il.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
	Vidya Sagar Ravipati <vidya@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [ethtool PATCH v4 11/11] ethtool.c: support absence of v4 sockets

will send a v5 shortly without this patch: question below.

about this patch: this is in prevision of a world where INET can be
compiled out. So it is not something that matters today with current
kernels.

Now, as you mentioned in another patch, the only socket that survives
various reasonable CONFIG_* gymnastics is netlink. So even though
non-IPv4 kernels with IP support is not feasible today, I believe
there is some logic to using netlink sockets for ethtool purposes,
instead of IPv4 or IPv6 sockets. Shall I propose a patch to add
ethtool support on AF_NETLINK sockets, and update the tool to try
AF_INET first for backward compatibility reasons, then fallback to
AF_NETLINK?

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 09:58 -0800, David Decotigny wrote:
>> From: David Decotigny <decot@...glers.com>
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Decotigny <decot@...glers.com>
>> ---
>>  ethtool.c | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/ethtool.c b/ethtool.c
>> index 761252f..f9336e3 100644
>> --- a/ethtool.c
>> +++ b/ethtool.c
>> @@ -4615,6 +4615,9 @@ opt_found:
>>               /* Open control socket. */
>>               ctx.fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
>>               if (ctx.fd < 0) {
>> +                     ctx.fd = socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
>> +             }
>
> You still haven't answered whether this is a real problem on Linux.
>
> Ben.
>
>> +             if (ctx.fd < 0) {
>>                       perror("Cannot get control socket");
>>                       return 70;
>>               }
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> If at first you don't succeed, you're doing about average.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ