netdev - Re: [PATCH] af_unix: closed SOCK_SEQPACKET socketpair must get SIGPIPE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1458048051.31401.32.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:20:51 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Cc:	edumazet@...gle.com, rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_unix: closed SOCK_SEQPACKET socketpair must get
 SIGPIPE

On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 10:03 +0100, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> According to IEEE Std 1003.1, 2013, sending data to a SOCK_SEQPACKET
> socketpair with MSG_NOSIGNAL flag set must result in a SIGPIPE if the
> socket is no longer connected.

I find this sentence slightly confusing ?

If MSG_NOSIGNAL is set, then SIGPIPE should not be generated.

s/with/without/ maybe ?