netdev - Re: [PATCH] af_unix: closed SOCK_SEQPACKET socketpair must get SIGPIPE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:35:37 +0100
From:	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_unix: closed SOCK_SEQPACKET socketpair must get SIGPIPE

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 10:03 +0100, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>> According to IEEE Std 1003.1, 2013, sending data to a SOCK_SEQPACKET
>> socketpair with MSG_NOSIGNAL flag set must result in a SIGPIPE if the
>> socket is no longer connected.
>
> I find this sentence slightly confusing ?
>
> If MSG_NOSIGNAL is set, then SIGPIPE should not be generated.
>
> s/with/without/ maybe ?
>
Agreed. I've rewritten this a couple of times and failed to proof-read
it for the last time.



-- 
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer

Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
80636 München

Geschäftsführer: Matthew Scott Sucherman, Paul Terence Manicle
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg