[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160316095039.GA22528@bistromath>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:50:39 +0100
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] macsec: introduce IEEE 802.1AE driver
Hello,
2016-03-15, 15:03:31 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > +struct macsec_rx_sa_stats {
> > + __u32 InPktsOK;
> > + __u32 InPktsInvalid;
> > + __u32 InPktsNotValid;
> > + __u32 InPktsNotUsingSA;
> > + __u32 InPktsUnusedSA;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct macsec_tx_sa_stats {
> > + __u32 OutPktsProtected;
> > + __u32 OutPktsEncrypted;
> > +};
>
> Just noticed this: is there a particular reason for using only __u32
> here? The others all seem to use __u64.
The standard defines them this way (Counter32 for the SA stats,
Counter64 for the SC/SecY stats).
> > +static int macsec_dump_txsc(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
> > netlink_callback *cb)
> > +{
> > + struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
> > + struct net_device *dev;
> > + int dev_idx, d;
> > +
> > + dev_idx = cb->args[0];
> > +
> > + d = 0;
> > + for_each_netdev(net, dev) {
> > + struct macsec_secy *secy;
> > +
> > + if (d < dev_idx)
> > + goto next;
> > +
> > + if (!netif_is_macsec(dev))
> > + goto next;
> > +
> > + secy = &macsec_priv(dev)->secy;
> > + if (dump_secy(secy, dev, skb, cb) < 0)
> > + goto done;
> > +next:
> > + d++;
> > + }
> > +
> > +done:
> > + cb->args[0] = d;
> > + return skb->len;
> > +}
>
> Maybe you should consider adding genl_dump_check_consistent() support
> here, so userspace can figure out if the dump was really consistent, if
> necessary.
>
> To do this, you have to keep a global generation counter that changes
> whenever this list changes (adding/removing macsec interfaces, I think)
> and then set
>
> cb->seq = macsec_generation_counter;
>
> at the beginning of this function, and call
> genl_dump_check_consistent() for each message in the loop.
Thanks, I'll have a look at this.
> Btw, aren't you missing locking here for for_each_netdev()?
Oops, yeah.
--
Sabrina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists