lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:24:47 -0700 From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@....com> To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>, Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@...to.com> Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, "ath10k@...ts.infradead.org" <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>, Jasmine Strong <jas@...o.com>, "codel@...ts.bufferbloat.net" <codel@...ts.bufferbloat.net>, make-wifi-fast@...ts.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Codel] [RFCv2 0/3] mac80211: implement fq codel On 03/17/2016 10:00 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > netperf's udp_rr is not how much traffic conventionally behaves. It > doesn't do tcp slow start or congestion control in particular... Nor would one expect it to need to, unless one were using "burst mode" to have more than one transaction inflight at one time. And unless one uses the test-specific -e option to provide a very crude retransmission mechanism based on a socket read timeout, neither does UDP_RR recover from lost datagrams. happy benchmarking, rick jones http://www.netperf.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists