[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKgT0Uds_==AZrM-5JsoCDYDQas3JVcXK6Z5B7-PYG+b=wyBnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:31:42 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
shannon nelson <shannon.nelson@...el.com>,
Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
"Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
Bruce W Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 net-next] ixgbe: Avoid unaligned access in ixgbe_atr()
for LLC packets
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Sowmini Varadhan
<sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com> wrote:
> On (03/16/16 15:58), Jeff Kirsher wrote:
>>
>> This does not apply since Alex Duyck beat you to the fix. Here is the
>> patch he submitted on 3/15 which corrects the issue. So I am dropping
>> your patch from the queue.
>>
>
> That's weird because Alexander was reviewing my fix on the various
> lists yesterday, so he could have just told me about this.
>
> But, whatever.
Sowmini,
Just for the record I didn't submit it on March 15 I submitted it on
January 26th as per the log in patchwork,
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/573058/.
Sorry I didn't realize the patch was not against the next-queue. Back
when I made that fix I was focused on the IPv6 portion of it so that
piece of it had slipped my mind. If it is any consolation at least my
patch is 7+ weeks ahead in the queue so hopefully the fix will make it
into net-next as soon as the merge window opens.
- Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists