netdev - Re: [PATCH (net-next.git) 0/2] STMMAC: MDIO settings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56EAACB9.40803@st.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:10:17 +0100
From:	Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <gabriel.fernandez@...aro.org>,
	<afaerber@...e.de>, <fschaefer.oss@...glemail.com>,
	<dinh.linux@...il.com>, <preid@...ctromag.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH (net-next.git) 0/2] STMMAC: MDIO settings

On 3/16/2016 11:09 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> Don't _ever_ send the same two sets of patches targetting net and
> net-next at the same time.

cover-letter reports the difference between the two patches for
net and next.

> Especially right now, as 'net' is basically frozen, and 'net-next' is
> closed for new features and is only for last minute bug fixes before I
> send a merge window pull request to Linus.

I do think that:

     [PATCH (net-next.git) 0/2] STMMAC: MDIO settings
     [PATCH (net-next.git)] stmmac: fix TX normal DESC

are last minute bug fixes for net-next.

Peppe

>
> I'm tossing both of these series, figure it how to do this properly.