lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:40:54 +0000 From: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org CC: johannes@...solutions.net, davem@...emloft.net, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: fix order of flag descriptions On 18/03/16 17:29, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 16:35 +0000, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: >> Fix order of mac80211_rx_flags description to match the enum. >> >> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com> >> --- >> Hi, >> >> I want ahead and fixed the order of the descriptions. checkpatch.pl was giving >> a warning to my previous patch and I had a hunch it was because the wrong order >> breaks the parser. Indeed it does and with this patch below checkpatch.pl does >> not complain about this flag descriptions anymore. > > checkpatch complains? About what? > warning: Enum value 'RX_FLAG_DUP_VALIDATED' not described in enum 'mac80211_rx_flags' Is the warning checkpatch.pl gives against my first patch (add doc for RX_FLAG_DUP_VALIDATED flag). This is silenced by reordering the descriptions to match the order in the enum. Thanks, Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists