[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160318201153.GR4292@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:11:53 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
Cc: Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: at803x: don't depend on GPIOLIB
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:31:20PM +0100, Mason wrote:
> On 18/03/2016 20:12, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:56:21PM +0100, Sebastian Frias wrote:
> >
> >> What would you think of making at803x_link_change_notify() print a
> >> message every time it should do a reset but does not has a way to do it?
> >
> > Then this question is obsolete because the device doesn't probe.
>
> I don't understand this statement.
>
> What does it mean for a question to be obsolete?
If the driver doesn't probe because it cannot control the reset line,
you don't need to think about how it should behave in
at803x_link_change_notify without control of the reset line, because
this code isn't reached then.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists