netdev - Re: [PATCH] sctp: do not update a_rwnd if we are not issuing a sack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160320.163145.1907195712733416950.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:31:45 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	marcelo.leitner@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...driver.com, vyasevich@...il.com,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: do not update a_rwnd if we are not issuing a sack

From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:39:18 -0300

> The SACK can be lost pretty much elsewhere, but if its allocation fail,
> we know we are not sending it, so it is better to revert a_rwnd to its
> previous value as this may give it a chance to issue a window update
> later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>

Applied.