[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1458508792.3317.16.camel@seering.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 17:19:52 -0400
From: Adam Seering <adam@...ring.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: acme@...stprotocols.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] appletalk: Pass IP-over-DDP packets through when
'ipddp0' interface is not present
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 19:46 -0500, Adam Seering wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 14:33 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Adam Seering <adam@...ring.org>
> > Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:19:13 -0500
> >
> > > Let userspace programs transmit and receive raw IP-over-DDP
> > > packets
> > > with a kernel where "ipddp" was compiled as a module but is not
> > loaded
> > > (so no "ipddp0" network interface is exposed). This makes the
> > "module
> > > is not loaded" behavior match the "module was never compiled"
> > behavior.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adam Seering <adam@...ring.org>
> >
> > I think a better approache is to somehow autoload the module.
>
> Could you elaborate? Specifically: the kernel currently suppresses
> packets on behalf of the module even after the module is unloaded.
> How
> would autoloading the module help with that?
>
I realize and appreciate that I'm not supposed to nag you folks for
feedback. But I don't know how to proceed. So, rather than nag you,
I've filed a bug:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115031
I've tested my patch; I believe it to be the simplest change that
resolves this bug. I'm happy to write something else if it would be
cleaner and/or help others, but I would need a more-detailed
explanation of what you're looking for.
I've also filed a ticket downstream: Red Hat appears to not build the
ipddp module with their stock kernel release, so their users don't hit
this bug. But Ubuntu does build/ship ipddp; if they likewise didn't,
that would also solve my problem:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-wily/+bug/1559772
Adam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists