[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160320142551-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:28:23 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next v2] virtio_net: replace netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align()
with napi_alloc_skb()
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:42:48PM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> This gives small but noticeable rx performance improvement (2-3%)
> and will allow exploiting future napi improvement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
I am not sure this is necessarily worth doing for this dumb hardware.
I queued v1 in vhost tree for now, let's see some performance
numbers before we start changing about other paths.
> --
> v2: replace also netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() invocation in
> add_recvbuf_small(), suggested by Venkatesh Srinivas
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index fb0eae4..100e039 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> p = page_address(page) + offset;
>
> /* copy small packet so we can reuse these pages for small data */
> - skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(vi->dev, GOOD_COPY_LEN);
> + skb = napi_alloc_skb(&rq->napi, GOOD_COPY_LEN);
> if (unlikely(!skb))
> return NULL;
>
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static int add_recvbuf_small(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr;
> int err;
>
> - skb = __netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(vi->dev, GOOD_PACKET_LEN, gfp);
> + skb = __napi_alloc_skb(&rq->napi, GOOD_PACKET_LEN, gfp);
> if (unlikely(!skb))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists