lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160321135630.GA95906@x-vnc01.mtx.labs.mlnx>
Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:56:30 +0200
From:	Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>
To:	Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx4_core: Fix backward compatibility on VFs

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 04:02:16PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> 
> After more tries, I found that if for whatever reason mlx4_core
> fails to stop while shutting the guest down (last message is
> "mlx4_core 0000:00:00.0: mlx4_shutdown was called"), then next time
> VF in guest won't start.
> 
> Example #1:
> 
> mlx4_core: Mellanox ConnectX core driver v2.2-1 (Feb, 2014)
> mlx4_core: Initializing 0000:00:00.0
> mlx4_core 0000:00:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> mlx4_core 0000:00:00.0: Detected virtual function - running in slave mode
> mlx4_core 0000:00:00.0: Sending reset
> mlx4_core 0000:00:00.0: Sending vhcr0
> mlx4_core 0000:00:00.0: HCA minimum page size:1
> mlx4_core 0000:00:00.0: UAR size:4096 != kernel PAGE_SIZE of 65536
> mlx4_core 0000:00:00.0: Failed to obtain slave caps

Alexey, can you verify that the value of the enable_4k_uar parameter
is false?

> 
> Example #2:
> 
> root@...dbg:~# dhclient eth0
> NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (mlx4_core): transmit queue 11 timed out
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at /home/aik/p/guest-kernel/net/sched/sch_generic.c:303
> 
> and no IP assigned, timed out.
> 
> 
> This is fixed by the guest restart, first restart might not help,
> then the second restart will.
> 
> The host is running the latest upstream plus the patch I am replying
> to. The guest is using initramdisk from debian bootstrap and vanilla
> v4.2 kernel, ppc64le arch, POWER8 chip, QEMU is running with 1 CPU
> and 2GB of RAM.
> 
> Does this look any familiar?
>

This is completely unrelated to the compatibility problem you reported
and which this patch addresses. We will reproduce in house and post a
fix.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ