[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160321173648.GA30581@c50.bag.software>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:36:50 +0100
From: Vishal Thanki <vishalthanki@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Matus Ujhelyi <ujhelyi.m@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: at803x: Add support to control PHY LEDs
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 07:07:12PM +0100, Vishal Thanki wrote:
> >
> > They might not be on/off controllable individually, but you can often
> > set them to show Packet RX, Packet TX, Link, speed, etc, in a
> > reasonably flexible way. So you could have LED triggers mapping to
> > these functionalities. The user can then pick the trigger for the LED.
> >
> > Actually, the data sheet says:
> >
> > 2.3.4 LED Interface
> >
> > The LED interface can either be controlled by the PHY or controlled
> > manually, independent of the state of the PHY. Two status LEDs are
> > available. These can be used to indicate operation speed, and link
> > status. The LEDs can be programmed to different status functions from
> > their default value. They can also be controlled directly from the MII
> > register interface.
> >
> > So maybe you can control the on/off state.
> >
I need some more understanding on using the LED subsystem for this task.
Pardon my lack of knowledge, and probably silly questions too.
Here is what I understood when we decide to use the LED subsystem for
exposing PHY LEDs.
1) Have a generic driver under drivers/leds/, for example leds-eth-phy.c
2) Implement a set of phylib APIs which will be used by generic phy led
driver to set the brightness.
3) The phylib APIs will depend on actual PHY driver, at803x.c for
example, (by means of callbacks implemented in PHY driver) to control LEDs.
4) PHY driver can advertise its support for LEDs using the capability
flags.
Please let me know if my understanding is correct.
Thanks,
Vishal
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists