[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+BoTQ=PWCK6cq83sthqRRt0xYWBOORbb=0+QHM6XVaWCWVhDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:51:06 +0100
From: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@...to.com>
To: David Lang <david@...g.hm>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"ath10k@...ts.infradead.org" <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>,
codel@...ts.bufferbloat.net, make-wifi-fast@...ts.bufferbloat.net,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Tim Shepard <shep@...m.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [RFCv2 1/3] mac80211: implement fq_codel for
software queuing
On 22 March 2016 at 02:35, David Lang <david@...g.hm> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Michal Kazior wrote:
>
>> Since 11n aggregation become important to get the
>> best out of txops. However aggregation inherently
>> requires buffering and queuing. Once variable
>> medium conditions to different associated stations
>> is considered it became apparent that bufferbloat
>> can't be simply fought with qdiscs for wireless
>> drivers.
>
> If the network is quiet enough, don't do any buffering, but in almost all
> situations you are going to need to buffer starting no later than the second
> packet you try to send.
>
> Don't try to make queueing occur, just deal with the queues that form
> naturally because you can't transmit data any faster (and work to keep them
> under some semblence of control)
[...]
This is what already happens. Queues typically start to build up when
hardware tx fifos/queues become busy so by the time they become
available you might have a bunch of frames you can aggregate.
The patch is more about getting rid of qdiscs because it's inherently
hard to teach them how 802.11 aggregation works (per-station per-tid)
and the ever-changing nature of per-station tx conditions.
I'll update the commit log to better reflect what is being done.
MichaĆ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists