[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160322181643.GA56461@kafai-mba.local>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:16:43 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: Wei Wang <tracywwnj@...il.com>
CC: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: Fix the pmtu path for connected UDP socket
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:03:29AM -0700, Wei Wang wrote:
> But one thing here, we will have to generate the same flowi6 in both
> ip6_sk_update_pmtu() as well as ip6_update_pmtu(). Is this considered
> as a not clean enough fix?
If they share common codes to build flowi6, can the common codes
be factored out?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists