[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1458758064.10868.42.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:34:24 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com, kaber@...sh.net,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vlan: propagate gso_min_segs
On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 14:25 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 19:33:52 -0700
>
> > On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 09:35 +0800, Haishuang Yan wrote:
> >> vlan drivers lack proper propagation of gso_min_segs from lower device.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>
> >> ---
> >
> > The plan was to get rid of gso_min_segs, as nothing uses it.
> >
> > Otherwise I would have included this in my recent patches...
> >
> > For such a rare 'issue' , we believe ndo_features_check() is better,
> > because it does not slow down the fast path.
>
> I'm not aplpying this.
I am adding to my TODO list a revert, when net-next opens again.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists