lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:40:58 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <>
To:	Sebastian Frias <>,
	Uwe Kleine-K├Ânig <>
Cc:	Daniel Mack <>,
	"David S. Miller" <>,,
	lkml <>, mason <>,
	Florian Fainelli <>,
	Mans Rullgard <>,
	Fabio Estevam <>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <>,
	Linus Walleij <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: at803x: Request 'reset' GPIO only for AT8030

On 03/24/2016 01:10 PM, Sebastian Frias wrote:

>>>     What I don't understand is why the link_change_notify() method ptr is
>>> populated for all 3 supported chips while only being needed on 8030...
>> You are right.
> I made the patch but I'm unsure about it because it could conflict with
> yours.
> I mean, I think you submitted a patch to change the GPIO handling on the
> link_change_notify() function, right?

> Well, if we only register the callback for the AT8030, then there is no
> more need for the callback to check the PHY ID.
> However, if I change that, the whole block moves as I remove one
> indentation level (the one required by the PHY ID check).
> Any suggestions on how to create a patch that won't conflict? I probably
> need to use a tree that already has your patch applied.

    My patch is already in Linus' tree, so should be merged back from net.git 
into net-next.git
soon. I suggest that you wait until net-next is open again.

> Best regards,
> Sebastian

MBR, Sergei

Powered by blists - more mailing lists