[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1458851740.12033.24.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:35:40 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, weiwan@...gle.com,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Subject: Re: [RFT Patch net 1/2] ipv6: invalidate the socket cached route on
pmtu events if possible
On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 12:25 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> void ip6_sk_update_pmtu(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk, __be32 mtu)
> {
> - ip6_update_pmtu(skb, sock_net(sk), mtu,
> - sk->sk_bound_dev_if, sk->sk_mark);
> + const struct ipv6hdr *iph = (struct ipv6hdr *)skb->data;
> + struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
> + struct dst_entry *ndst, *dst;
> + struct flowi6 fl6;
> + bool new = false;
> +
> + memset(&fl6, 0, sizeof(fl6));
> +
> + bh_lock_sock(sk);
> +
This is not clear why you need to acquire socket lock.
sk_dst_cache is protected by an atomic operation.
udp for example calls ip6_dst_store() without socket being locked.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists