netdev - Re: veth regression with "don’t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good."

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160325.150024.1646139617211983730.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:00:24 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	greearb@...delatech.com
Cc:	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, vijayp@...ayp.ca, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	ej@...njones.ca, cwang@...pensource.com, tom@...bertland.com
Subject: Re: veth regression with "don’t modify
 ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good."

From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:14:46 -0700

> Anyway, you know the stack and drivers better than me, so if you
> think Cong's patch is valid, then I'll test it and make sure it
> works in my setups at least.

It probably is, I'm just waiting to see if Tom Herbert will give
some feedback or not as this is an area he understands well.