netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Introduce _mv88e6xxx_phy_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJweMdYoiA5mwHW3kSQOY0y46=GuLhnBor7mS3kXo9K3FGqW4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 26 Mar 2016 02:58:56 +0100
From:	Patrick Uiterwijk <patrick@...terwijk.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, andrew@...n.ch,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@...il.us>,
	Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Introduce _mv88e6xxx_phy_page_{read,write}

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> On 03/25/2016 05:10 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
>>
>> Add versions of the phy_page_read and _write functions to
>> be used in a context where the SMI mutex is held.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Uiterwijk <patrick@...terwijk.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c | 42
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>   1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
>> index fa086e0..13db5d8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c
>> @@ -2708,37 +2708,59 @@ int mv88e6xxx_switch_reset(struct dsa_switch *ds,
>> bool ppu_active)
>>         return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> -int mv88e6xxx_phy_page_read(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, int page,
>> int reg)
>> +static int _mv88e6xxx_phy_page_read(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, int
>> page,
>> +                                   int reg)
>>   {
>> -       struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state *ps = ds_to_priv(ds);
>>         int ret;
>>
>> -       mutex_lock(&ps->smi_mutex);
>>         ret = _mv88e6xxx_phy_write_indirect(ds, port, 0x16, page);
>>         if (ret < 0)
>> -               goto error;
>> +               goto clear;
>>         ret = _mv88e6xxx_phy_read_indirect(ds, port, reg);
>> -error:
>> +clear:
>
>
> Is there some good reason for changing the name of those labels ?

Vivien suggested to rename this since it makes more clear that this write is
meant to return to page 0 to make sure that phylib doesn't get confused
about the currently active page.

Patrick

>
> Guenter
>
>
>>         _mv88e6xxx_phy_write_indirect(ds, port, 0x16, 0x0);
>> -       mutex_unlock(&ps->smi_mutex);
>> +
>>         return ret;
>>   }
>>
>> -int mv88e6xxx_phy_page_write(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, int page,
>> -                            int reg, int val)
>> +int mv88e6xxx_phy_page_read(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, int page,
>> int reg)
>>   {
>>         struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state *ps = ds_to_priv(ds);
>>         int ret;
>>
>>         mutex_lock(&ps->smi_mutex);
>> +       ret = _mv88e6xxx_phy_page_read(ds, port, page, reg);
>> +       mutex_unlock(&ps->smi_mutex);
>> +
>> +       return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int _mv88e6xxx_phy_page_write(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, int
>> page,
>> +                                    int reg, int val)
>> +{
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>>         ret = _mv88e6xxx_phy_write_indirect(ds, port, 0x16, page);
>>         if (ret < 0)
>> -               goto error;
>> +               goto clear;
>>
>>         ret = _mv88e6xxx_phy_write_indirect(ds, port, reg, val);
>> -error:
>> +clear:
>>         _mv88e6xxx_phy_write_indirect(ds, port, 0x16, 0x0);
>> +
>> +       return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int mv88e6xxx_phy_page_write(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, int page,
>> +                            int reg, int val)
>> +{
>> +       struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state *ps = ds_to_priv(ds);
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       mutex_lock(&ps->smi_mutex);
>> +       ret = _mv88e6xxx_phy_page_write(ds, port, page, reg, val);
>>         mutex_unlock(&ps->smi_mutex);
>> +
>>         return ret;
>>   }
>>
>>
>