netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: sxgbe: fix error paths in sxgbe_platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160327082254.GA10620@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date:	Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:22:54 +0200
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sxgbe: fix error paths in sxgbe_platform_probe()

Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> :
> We need to use post-decrement to ensure that irq_dispose_mapping is
> also called on priv->rxq[0]->irq_no; moreover, if one of the above for
> loops failed already at i==0 (so we reach one of these labels with
> that value of i), we'll enter an essentially infinite loop of
> out-of-bounds accesses.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>

(ok, i is signed)

Reviewed-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>

Someone messed with my review on 2014/03/25 and got it wrong. :o/

Two years after the initial submission, there is zero change regarding use
of sxgbe_core_ops for extension or manageability. The extra indirection is
ripe for removal during next net-next.

-- 
Ueimor