[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56F95884.8010901@hpe.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:15:00 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@....com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 2/2] udp: No longer use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU
On 03/25/2016 03:29 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> UDP sockets are not short lived in the high usage case, so the added
> cost of call_rcu() should not be a concern.
Even a busy DNS resolver?
rick jones
Powered by blists - more mailing lists