lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160329224043.GY3784@sliepen.org>
Date:	Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:40:43 +0200
From:	Guus Sliepen <guus@...c-vpn.org>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Best way to reduce system call overhead for tun device I/O?

I'm trying to reduce system call overhead when reading/writing to/from a
tun device in userspace. For sockets, one can use sendmmsg()/recvmmsg(),
but a tun fd is not a socket fd, so this doesn't work. I'm see several
options to allow userspace to read/write multiple packets with one
syscall:

- Implement a TX/RX ring buffer that is mmap()ed, like with AF_PACKET
  sockets.

- Implement a ioctl() to emulate sendmmsg()/recvmmsg().

- Add a flag that can be set using TUNSETIFF that makes regular
  read()/write() calls handle multiple packets in one go.

- Expose a socket fd to userspace, so regular sendmmsg()/recvmmsg() can
  be used. There is tun_get_socket() which is used internally in the
  kernel, but this is not exposed to userspace, and doesn't look trivial
  to do either.

What would be the right way to do this?

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
     Guus Sliepen <guus@...c-vpn.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ